FurMark Scores, Comparative Charts (v1.9, 1.10, 1.13, 1.14)

FurMark 1.10.0, OpenGL benchmark

Update: 2022.11.18
Preset:1080
– GeForce RTX 4090
– Intel Arc A750
– Intel Arc A380

Update: 2022.08.03
Preset:1080
– Radeon RX 6800 XT
– GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
– GeForce RTX 3080

Update: 2020.01.24
Preset:1080
– Radeon RX 5500 XT
– GeForce RTX 2070

Update: 2017.12.13
Preset:1080
– Radeon RX Vega 64 CrossFire
– Radeon RX Vega 64

Update: 2017.12.12
– added Preset:2160 scores.
– added GTX 1080 2-way SLI P1080 score.

Update: 2016.08.25
Preset:1080
– GeForce GTX 1080, GeForce GTX 1060, GeForce GTX 980 Ti
– Radeon RX 470

Update: 2014.11.10
Preset:1080
– MSI Radeon R9 920X Gaming 4G

Update: 2014.09.24
Preset:1080
– GeForce GTX TITAN Black
– GeForce GTX TITAN
– GIGABYTE BRIX GTX 760

Here are the charts of FurMark scores for AMD Radeon and NVIDIA GeForce graphics cards (and Intel HD Graphics GPUs as well). These scores can be used as reference for checking your FurMark score with FurMark 1.9.x and FurMark 1.10.x (will be released shortly, currently in testing…). Each entry includes the model of the graphics card with clock speeds, the TPC (Total Power Consumption) of the X58 testbed at idle and under full load, the max GPU temperature and the graphics driver version.

FurMark is an OpenGL 2 benchmark. Almost all existing graphics cards can be benchmarked with FurMark: GeForce 6 / 7/ 8 / 9 / GTX200 / GTX400 / GTX500 / GTX600, Radeon X1900 / HD2000 / HD3000 / HD4000 / HD5000 / HD6000 / HD7000, Intel HD Graphics 2000 / 3000 / 4000.

These charts will be updated as regularly as possible with new graphics cards or new graphics drivers (only if there are significant changes in performance).

Three kind of scores are available on these charts:

  • Preset:1080: 1920×1080 fullscreen, 0X MSAA, 60 seconds, dynamic background, burn-in mode checked in the Settings box
  • Preset:720: 1280×720 fullscreen, 0X MSAA, 60 seconds, dynamic background, burn-in mode checked in the Settings box
  • Custom preset: 1280×1024 fullscreen, 0X MSAA, 60 seconds, dynamic background, burn-in mode checked in the Settings box




1 – Preset:1080

Settings: Preset:1080 (1920×1080 fullscreen, 0X MSAA, 60 seconds, dynamic background, burn-in test mode)

Other scores can be found online in FurMark GPU Database section.

– GeForce RTX 4090, R526.86 (Win10 64-bit)
– 37387 points (623 FPS)
– Radeon RX 6800 XT, Radeon Adrenalin 22.7.1 (Win10 64-bit)
– 18035 points (301 FPS)
– GeForce RTX 3080, GeForce 512.15 (Win10 64-bit)
– 17197 points (286 FPS)
– GeForce GTX 1080 2-way SLI, GeForce 388.59 (Win10 64-bit)
– 12173 points (202 FPS)
– Radeon RX Vega 64 2-way CrossFire, Radeon Adrenalin 17.12.1 (Win10 64-bit)
– 11707 points (195 FPS)
– GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (default clock speeds), R516.59 (Win10 64-bit)
– 10707 points (178 FPS)
– ASUS ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC 8GB (default clock speeds), R430.64 (Win10 64-bit)
– 10208 points (170 FPS)
– Intel Arc A750 LED 8GB (default clock speeds), Arc driver 3793 (Win10 64-bit)
– 10137 points (169 FPS)
– MSI GeForce RTX 2070 Ventus (default clock speeds), R417.01 (Win10 64-bit)
– 9270 points (154 FPS)
– Radeon RX Vega 64, Radeon Adrenalin 17.12.1 (Win10 64-bit)
– 7765 points (129 FPS)
– ASUS GeForce GTX 980 Ti (default clock speeds), R353.06 (Win10 64-bit)
– 6233 points (103 FPS)
– MSI R9 290X Gaming 4G (default clock speeds), Catalyst 14.9 WHQL (Win8 64-bit) – PowerTune: +20%
– 4922 points (82 FPS)
– Sapphire Radeon HD 6970 CrossFire (GPU@880MHz, mem@1375MHz, max GPU temp:78°C, two GPUs / CrossFire ON), TPC: 87W(PSU1) + 33W(PSU2) /430W(PSU1) + 240W(PSU2) (on H67 testbed v2), Catalyst 12.3 whql (Win 7 64-bit)
– 4704 points (78 FPS), PowerTune: +20%
– EVGA GTX 1060 SC 6GB (default clock speeds), R372.54 (Win10 64-bit)
– 4578 points (76 FPS)
– MSI R9 290X Gaming 4G (default clock speeds), Catalyst 14.9 WHQL (Win8 64-bit) – PowerTune: 0%
– 4577 points (76 FPS)
– SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB (default clock speeds), Adrenalin 20.1.3 (Win10 64-bit)
– 4436 points (74 FPS)
– NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Black (default clock speeds), R340.11 (Win8.1 64-bit)
– 4245 points (70 FPS)
– NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN (default clock speeds), R340.11 (Win8.1 64-bit)
– 4088 points (68 FPS)
– EVGA GeForce GTX 780 (default clock speeds), R331.40 (Win8 64-bit)
– 4083 points (68 FPS)
– MSI Radeon RX 470 Gaming 8G (default clock speeds), Crimson 16.8.2 (Win10 64-bit)
– 3942 points (66 FPS)
– MSI GTX 970 CLASSIC 4GD5T OC (default clock speeds), GeForce 430.64 (Win10 64-bit)
– 3898 points (64 FPS)
– Sapphire Radeon HD 6970 CF (GPU@880MHz, mem@1375MHz, max GPU temp:78°C, two GPUs / CrossFire ON), TPC: 87W(PSU1) + 33W(PSU2) /352W(PSU1) + 176W(PSU2) (on H67 testbed v2), Catalyst 12.3 whql (Win 7 64-bit)
– 3505 points (58 FPS), PowerTune: 0%
– MSI Radeon HD 7970 (GPU@925MHz, mem@1375MHz, max GPU temp:68°C), TPC:105W/383W, Catalyst 12.3 whql (Win 7 64-bit)
– 3363 points (56 FPS), PowerTune: +20%
– MSI Radeon HD 7970 (GPU@925MHz, mem@1375MHz, max GPU temp:79°C), TPC:75W/346W (on H67 testbed), Catalyst 12.3 whql (Win 7 64-bit)
– 3361 points (56 FPS), PowerTune: +20%
– ASRock Arc A380 6GB (default clock speeds), Arc driver 3491 (Win10 64-bit)
– 3036 points (50 FPS)
– EVGA GeForce GTX 680 (GPU@1005MHz, mem@3004MHz, max GPU temp:74°C), TPC:101W/312W, GPU power: 115% TDP, R301.24 beta (branch r301_07-12, Win 7 64-bit)
– 2699 points (44 FPS)
– MSI Radeon HD 7970 (GPU@925MHz, mem@1375MHz, max GPU temp:76°C), TPC:75W/280W (on H67 testbed), Catalyst 12.3 whql (Win 7 64-bit)
– 2582 points (43 FPS), PowerTune: 0%
– MSI Radeon HD 7970 (GPU@925MHz, mem@1375MHz, max GPU temp:68°C), TPC:105W/339W, Catalyst 12.3 whql (Win 7 64-bit)
– 2582 points (43 FPS), PowerTune: 0%
– EVGA GeForce GTX 580 Classified Ultra (GPU@900MHz, mem@2106MHz, max GPU temp:87°C), TPC:116W/530W, R301.24 beta (branch r301_07-12, Win 7 64-bit)
– 2403 points (40 FPS)
– Sapphire Radeon HD 6970 (GPU@880MHz, mem@1375MHz, max GPU temp:78°C), TPC:78W/352W (on H67 testbed), Catalyst 12.3 whql (Win 7 64-bit)
– 2402 points (40 FPS), PowerTune: +20%
– EVGA GeForce GTX 580 SC (GPU@797MHz, mem@2025MHz, max GPU temp:91°C), TPC:85W/452W (on H67 testbed), R263.09 whql (branch r260_uda_final-58, Win 7 64-bit)
– 2144 points (35 FPS)
– MSI GeForce GTX 660 Hawk (default clock speeds), R327.24 (Win7 64-bit)
– 2142 points (35 FPS)
– MSI Radeon HD 5770 Hawk CF (GPU@875MHz, mem@1200MHz, max GPU temp:69°C, two GPUs / CrossFire ON), TPC:120W/350W, Catalyst 12.3 whql (Win 7 64-bit)
– 2135 points (35 FPS)
– AMD Radeon HD 5870 (GPU@850MHz, mem@1200MHz, max GPU temp:84°C), TPC:102W/320W, Catalyst 12.3 whql (Win 7 64-bit)
– 2130 points (35 FPS)
– MSI GeForce GTX 580 Lightning (GPU@772MHz, mem@2004MHz, max GPU temp:97°C), TPC:125W/564W, R263.09 whql (branch r260_uda_final-58, Win 7 64-bit)
– 2077 points (34 FPS)
– Sapphire Radeon HD 5850 (GPU@765MHz, mem@1125MHz, max GPU temp:66°C), TPC:110W/276W, Catalyst 12.3 whql (Win 7 64-bit)
– 1805 points (30 FPS)
– Sapphire Radeon HD 6970 (GPU@880MHz, mem@1375MHz, max GPU temp:78°C), TPC:78W/286W (on H67 testbed), Catalyst 12.3 whql (Win 7 64-bit)
– 1776 points (29 FPS), PowerTune: 0%
– EVGA GeForce GTX 480 (GPU@700MHz, mem@1848MHz, max GPU temp:89°C), TPC:105W/405W (on H67 testbed), R296.10 whql (branch r295_43-27, Win 7 64-bit)
– 1758 points (29 FPS)
– EVGA GeForce GTX 295 CO-OP (GPU@576MHz, mem@1008MHz, max GPU temp:73°C, two GPUs enabled / SLI ON), TPC:130W/414W, R301.24 beta (branch r301_07-12, Win 7 64-bit)
– 1754 points (29 FPS)
– Sapphire Radeon HD 6870 (GPU@900MHz, mem@1050MHz, max GPU temp:82°C), TPC:104W/277W, Catalyst 12.3 whql (Win 7 64-bit)
– 1668 points (27 FPS)
– MSI GeForce GTX 470 (GPU@607MHz, mem@1674MHz, max GPU temp:93°C), TPC:124W/347W, R296.10 whql (branch r295_43-27, Win 7 64-bit)
– 1424 points (23 FPS)
– GIGABYTE BRIX GTX 760 (default clock speeds), R340.76 (Win 8.1 64-bit)
– 1409 points (23 FPS)
– ASUS GeForce GTX 750 (default clock speeds, max GPU temp:51°C), R340.65 (Win 8.1 64-bit)
– 1339 points (22 FPS)
– MSI GTX 460 Cyclone 768D5/OC (GPU@729MHz, mem@1804MHz, max GPU temp:67°C), TPC:100W/268W, R301.24 beta (branch r301_07-12, Win 7 64-bit)
– 1187 points (19 FPS)
– MSI Radeon HD 5770 Hawk (GPU@875MHz, mem@1200MHz, max GPU temp:68°C), TPC:110W/224W, Catalyst 12.3 whql (Win 7 64-bit)
– 1078 points (17 FPS)
– ASUS Radeon HD 7770 DirectCU TOP (GPU@1120MHz, mem@1150MHz, max GPU temp:59°C), TPC:75W/182W, Catalyst 12.3 whql (Win 7 64-bit)
– 1036 points (17 FPS)
– MSI GeForce GTX 580 Lightning (GPU@772MHz, mem@2004MHz, max GPU temp:72°C), TPC:133/374W, R296.10 whql (branch r295_43-27, Win 7 64-bit)
– 1025 points (17 FPS) – GPU is throttled down (at 192MHz with R296.10, R301.24)!
– EVGA GeForce GTX 280 (GPU@601MHz, mem@1107MHz, max GPU temp:79°C, TPC:125W/322W), R301.24 beta (branch r301_07-12, Win 7 64-bit)
– 919 points (15 FPS)
– EVGA GeForce GTX 295 CO-OP (GPU@576MHz, mem@1008MHz, max GPU temp:71°C, one GPU enabled / SLI OFF, TPC:130W/294W), R301.24 beta (branch r301_07-12, Win 7 64-bit)
– 879 points (14 FPS)
– MSI GeForce GTX 260 (GPU@621MHz, mem@1080MHz, max GPU temp:68°C), R301.24 beta (branch r301_07-12, Win 7 64-bit)
– 739 points (12 FPS)
– MSI Radeon HD 4850 Hybrid Frozr (GPU@640MHz, mem@993MHz, max GPU temp:82°C), TPC:112W/194W, Catalyst 12.3 whql (Win 7 64-bit)
– 577 points (9 FPS) (GPU throttled down by Catalyst?)
– HIS Radeon HD 3870 (GPU@777MHz, mem@1126MHz, max GPU temp:93°C), TPC:105W/230W, Catalyst 12.3 whql (Win 7 64-bit)
– 576 points (9 FPS)
– AMD A10-7850K (Radeon R7, default clock speeds, RAM: DDR3 @ 2400MHz), Catalyst 14.4 WHQL (Win 8 64-bit)
– 487 points (8 FPS)
– NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX (GPU@576MHz, mem@900MHz, max GPU temp:77°C), TPC:133W/261W, R296.10 whql (branch r295_43-27, Win 7 64-bit)
– 481 points (8 FPS)
– Intel Graphics HD 5000 (Microsoft Surface PRO 3)
– 434 points (7 FPS)
– ASUS GeForce 7950 GX2 (GPU@500MHz, mem@600MHz, max GPU temp:95°C, two GPUs enabled / SLI ON), TPC:128W/249W, R296.10 whql (branch r295_43-27, Win 7 64-bit)
– 415 points (6 FPS)
– Zotac GeForce GT 240 (GPU@550MHz, mem@790MHz, max GPU temp:65°C), TPC:88W/144W, R296.10 whql (branch r295_43-27, Win 7 64-bit)
– 356 points (5 FPS)
– MSI GeForce 9600 GT Diamond (GPU@650MHz, mem@850MHz, max GPU temp:46°C), R301.24 beta (branch r301_07-12, Win 7 64-bit)
– 349 points (5 FPS)
– AMD A10-7850K (Radeon R7, default clock speeds, RAM: DDR3 @ 1600MHz), Catalyst 14.4 WHQL (Win 8 64-bit)
– 335 points (5 FPS)
– ASUS GeForce 7950 GX2 (GPU@500MHz, mem@600MHz, max GPU temp:84°C, one GPU enabled / SLI OFF), TPC:128W/201W, R296.10 whql (branch r295_43-27, Win 7 64-bit)
– 208 points (3 FPS)
– ASUS Radeon HD 2400 (GPU@525MHz, mem@400MHz, max GPU temp:40°C), TPC:80W/117W, Catalyst 12.3 whql (Win 7 64-bit)
– 41 points (1 FPS)

Pages: 1 2 3 4

Related posts:

  1. GPU Benchmark Scores (1080p)
  2. (Tested) Unigine Heaven 2.0 Direct3D 11 Scores
  3. GpuTest 0.2.0: Cross Platform OpenGL Benchmark, FurMark Lands on Linux and OS X
  4. AMD FirePro W9100 OpenGL 4 FP32 and FP64 Scores (Julia Fractal)
  5. (TessMark) OpenGL 4 Tessellation Benchmark: Comparative Table

112 thoughts on “FurMark Scores, Comparative Charts (v1.9, 1.10, 1.13, 1.14)”

  1. Justified

    just ran 1920×1080 with a EVGA GTX SC 780 with Win7 64bit and an i7-4770K nothing OC’d score: 3099 @59 fps

    Ran a 720 test with same build and scored 5250 @87 frames.

    Dunno if this is good or bad lol, just starting my path to Overclocking.

  2. redklu3

    BURN-IN SCORE: 7446 points
    74211 frames, 82 FPS, 97 deg C
    Res: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples
    FPS: min:59, max:130, avg:82 – OPTIONS: DynBkg

    System Info
    Renderer: AMD Radeon HD 7900 Series (1002-6798)
    Drivers Catalyst 13.9 – 13.251-131206a-165817C-ATI (12-6-2013)
    Clocks: GPU core: 1085 MHz, memory: 1700 MHz
    CPU: AMD FX(tm)-8350 Eight-Core Processor
    CPU Speed: 4721 MHz System Memory: 16344 MB
    OS: Windows 7 64-bit build 7600 [No Service Pack]

    quick benchmarks preset:1080
    http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=157091

  3. kramsit

    hmmm think i kinda did well, benchmark score of 6785 and burn in test score of 6589. Gtx Titan, FPS 72 and temp of 34 degress 🙂

  4. rexxxar

    Score: 2432 points (40 FPS, 60000 ms)

    GPU @ 935 Mhz
    VRAM @ 2100 Mhz
    Voltage @ 1.113

    Max GPU Temp: 76 C
    Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples
    FPS: min 41, max 42, avg 40 – OPTIONS: DynBkg

    Renderer GTX 580 (10DE-1080)
    Drivers 9.18.13.3165 (10-23-2013) GL: nvoglv64
    Clocks: core 935 Mhz, memory 2100 Mhz
    CPU: Intel i7 2600k @ 3.4 Ghz, turbo 4.4 Ghz
    CPU Speed: 3400 Mhz
    System Memory: 16gb
    OS: Windows 7 64bit SP1

  5. Shubham

    GeForce GTX 765M (OC)/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-11E2)
    GPU core: 914 MHz, memory: 2323 MHz (OC)

    Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4700MQ CPU @ 2.40GHz

    Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples
    SCORE:1003 points (16 FPS, 60000 ms)
    FPS: min:17, max:18, avg:16 – OPTIONS: DynBkg
    Max GPU Temp: 58°C

  6. dato

    msi radeon hd 3450 OC GPU core: 680 MHz, memory: 500 MHz
    SCORE:97 points (1 FPS, 60000 ms)
    Resolution: 1920×1080 (W) – AA:0 samples
    Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8400 @ 3.00GHz
    ram ddr2 3gb

  8. Gage

    What do I do when there’s no resolution even close to mine :< I have no idea if 13 FPS is good or not

    Res: 7680×1440 with 8xMSAA

  9. Mao

    my result (1920×1080);

    i5-4670k z87 4.1Ghz

    r9 280x twin-x(single) – score:3143, 50fps, 66 deg cal

    r9 280x toxic(single) – score:3702, 61fps, 73 deg cal

    Xfire r9 280x(using above GPUs) – score:6601, 110fps, 87 deg cal

  10. Tourouk

    Score: 8118 points (89fps)

    1920x1080p full screen
    SLI Gigabyte gtx 670 windforce OC
    gpu clocks 1124/1110Mhz
    températures: 53°c/55°c (watercooling)

  12. Galford

    I got 2344 points on gtx680m is that ok ?
    [img=http://iceimg.com/DfUdqm0-/capture]

Comments are closed.